Networkx version: 2.6.3

>> Number of annotated documents: 53784

{'_id': ObjectId('619e3b52c0faefa502a7fa09'),
 'argumentID': '5-1',
 'approach': 'A2 -> C+(L+P)',
 'claim': {'text': 'Mi idea es dar un uso al arco de la victoria de Moncloa',
  'nouns': ['idea', 'uso', 'arco', 'victoria'],
  'entities': ['Moncloa']},
 'commentID': -1,
 'linker': {'linker': 'en lugar de',
  'category': 'CONTRAST',
  'subCategory': 'ALTERNATIVE',
  'relationType': 'support/attack'},
 'mainVerb': 'dar',
 'majorClaim': {'text': 'Uso artistico y de promocion del  Arco de la Victoria',
  'nouns': ['Uso', 'promocion'],
  'entities': ['Arco', 'laVictoria']},
 'parentID': -1,
 'premise': {'text': 'demolerlo', 'nouns': ['demolerlo'], 'entities': []},
 'proposalID': 5,
 'sentence': 'Mi idea es dar un uso al arco de la victoria de Moncloa, en lugar de demolerlo, como soporte para promos de actividades en Madrid (semana del orgullo gay, congresos mundiales, eventos futbol, etc)',
 'userID': 9866}

Proposals number: 11546
Comments number: 42238
Comments with response number: 15397 , % share: 0.36

Total edge list: 13
[('c49076-c49275', 4), ('p19-c19750', 3), ('c49275-c49749', 2), ('c49749-c51540', 2), ('p19-c78277', 2), ('p19-c83953', 2), ('p19-c17391', 1), ('p19-c17486', 1), ('p19-c18386', 1), ('p19-c19178', 1)]

n_nodes: 15 , n_edges: 13
graph density: 0.06190476190476191

matrix([[0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 2],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
        [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]], dtype=int32)

matrix([[1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 1., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 1., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 1.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
        [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0.]])

	proposal	arguments_num	% share
0	pid-1419	719	1.34
1	pid-15711	478	0.89
2	pid-59	443	0.82
3	pid-965	391	0.73
4	pid-20389	288	0.54
5	pid-64	287	0.53
6	pid-1085	237	0.44
7	pid-49	230	0.43
8	pid-20657	211	0.39
9	pid-615	205	0.38

	category	frequency
1	CONSEQUENCE	17882
3	ELABORATION	16969
0	CAUSE	10424
2	CONTRAST	8071
4	EXPLANATION	438

	category	subCategory	frequency
2	CONSEQUENCE	GOAL	16252
8	ELABORATION	ADDITION	10832
0	CAUSE	CONDITION	5372
12	ELABORATION	SIMILARITY	5146
1	CAUSE	REASON	5052
7	CONTRAST	OPPOSITION	4659
4	CONTRAST	ALTERNATIVE	1833
3	CONSEQUENCE	RESULT	1630
6	CONTRAST	CONCESSION	1561
10	ELABORATION	CONCLUSION	368

	category	linker	frequency
97	CONSEQUENCE	para	16132
215	ELABORATION	y	9454
176	ELABORATION	como	4970
58	CAUSE	si	4512
152	CONTRAST	pero	3931
53	CAUSE	porque	2369
64	CAUSE	ya que	1341
68	CONSEQUENCE	asi	773
148	CONTRAST	ni	721
117	CONTRAST	aunque	680

	relationType	linker	frequency
166	support	para	16132
202	support	y	9454
81	support	como	4970
62	qualifier	si	4512
24	attack	pero	3931
188	support	porque	2369
203	support	ya que	1341
78	support	asi	773
221	support/attack	ni	721
7	attack	aunque	680

Annotation Data Analysis¶

1. Reading data¶

2. Data processing¶

2.1. Summary of proposals and comments¶

2.2. Most used categories¶

2.3. Most common sub-categories¶

2.4. Most used linkers by category¶

2.5. Most used linkers by relation type¶

2.6. Most common entities¶

2.7. Most common nouns¶

2.8. Most common main verbs¶

3. Network analysis¶

3.1. Process network data¶

3.2. Plot network data¶

Adjacency matrix¶

Incidence matrix¶

Plotting Directed Weighted Graph¶

	category	subCategory	linker	relationType
0	CONTRAST	ALTERNATIVE	en lugar de	support/attack
1	ELABORATION	SIMILARITY	como	support
2	CONTRAST	OPPOSITION	pero	attack
3	CONTRAST	OPPOSITION	sino	attack
4	CONTRAST	OPPOSITION	pero	attack
5	CAUSE	REASON	ya que	support
6	CONSEQUENCE	GOAL	para	support
7	CAUSE	REASON	ya que	support
8	ELABORATION	SIMILARITY	como	support
9	CAUSE	CONDITION	si	qualifier

	entities	frequency	% share
0	Madrid	3589	10.26
1	Ayuntamiento	928	2.65
2	Espana	393	1.12
3	https://decide.madrid.es/proposals/...	257	0.73
4	general	238	0.68
5	ciclista	238	0.68
6	EMT	225	0.64
7	IBI	208	0.59
8	Vallecas	204	0.58
9	Metro	200	0.57

	nouns	frequency	% share
0	propuesta	4726	1.81
1	calle	2314	0.89
2	gente	2069	0.79
3	zona	2029	0.78
4	personas	1968	0.75
5	ciudad	1946	0.74
6	barrio	1865	0.71
7	perros	1694	0.65
8	tambien	1640	0.63
9	calles	1485	0.57

	main verbs	frequency	% share
0	creo	1528	3.01
1	tiene	947	1.86
2	propongo	803	1.58
3	parece	761	1.50
4	hacer	630	1.24
5	pido	556	1.09
6	tienen	520	1.02
7	estan	506	1.00
8	tenemos	472	0.93
9	crear	460	0.91